In 2026, the viral photograph of the former prince briefly entered the Louvre, but only to intensify its existing meaning by borrowing the institution’s authority. That shift tells us less about the guilt of the individuals involved than it does about the evolution of spectacle itself. Above all, it suggests an ominous, growing impatience with ambiguity.
Posted on December 17, 2025, 9:22 AM, by jfriedman, under
art history.
Rejecting sentimental or anecdotal portraiture, Thiebaud cultivates a suspended psychological charge, inviting viewers into the role of Wollheim’s “unrepresented spectator.” His sitters—poised before or after action—occupy pared-down spaces where gesture is displaced by the quiet gravity of presence. Through this deliberate withholding, Thiebaud reanimates classical problems of painting, aligning himself with Velázquez and Manet while translating their concerns into an American vernacular. His figures do not perform; they simply—and profoundly—are.
Posted on July 18, 2025, 8:53 PM, by jfriedman, under
art history.
Perhaps this is why Alpers is befuddled by today’s disciplinary confusion in which art, the master, is subjugated by art history, supposedly its emissary. Consider the following remark she made in a 2022 follow-up to the earlier conversation with Ziegler: “I agree with my great, late art historian friend Michael Podro, who said that painting has self-substance that insulates it from events and changes in the world of things—political, religious, or personal. Painting just goes along.”
Posted on July 18, 2025, 8:44 PM, by jfriedman, under
art history.
“Wayne Thiebaud: Art Comes from Art,” which opened at the California Palace of the Legion of Honor in San Francisco on March 22, is organized by the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco and curated by Timothy Anglin Burgard. Its premise, spelled out in the title, is straight forward enough and firmly based on the […]
When British sculptor Thomas J Price explains that his “strategy of inclusion” will counter the “endless stream of limiting tropes and identities for Black people,” he is inadvertently mimicking totalitarian injunctions.
A sad reminder of that newer does not mean better, as illustrated by the Getty Center exhibition “Gustave Caillebotte: Painting Men.” The organizers of “Painting Men” which aims to address the shortcomings of Caillebotte scholarship’s “blinkered view” concerning his purported “male bias” and alleged “questioning of masculine identity that seems freshly relevant today” were not deterred […]
Posted on October 17, 2024, 12:28 PM, by jfriedman, under
art history.
My latest article for Quillette is an update of sorts on Robert Hughes’ writings from three decades ago about the “therapeutic fallacy” and the “censorious right.” Now it is the censorious left that is swinging the bat.